Public

Wilderness Fundamentals

Introduction

The purpose of the Wilderness Fundamentals Toolbox is to promote wilderness awareness by providing a clear understanding of the wilderness concept, as defined by the 1964 Wilderness Act and subsequent laws. It also establishes stable references for terminology and management principles that withstand changes in staffing, funding, politics, and cultural shifts within agencies and society.

Wilderness stewardship is a shared responsibility among federal land management agencies, wilderness advocates, and the public. Wilderness is not an isolated resource; it is part of the broader land management system, requiring collective conservation efforts to preserve its unique values as part of an interconnected ecosystem.

Objectives: 

  • Equip Practitioners with Tools: Provide practical, easy-to-use resources for field managers, resource specialists, and volunteer stewards while being accessible to other agency employees and the public.
  • Promote Wilderness Values: Highlight the recreational, ecological, spiritual, and cultural benefits of wilderness, emphasizing its role in enhancing quality of life.
  • Encourage Use of the Wilderness Act: Reinforce the importance of the 1964 Wilderness Act as a guiding framework for addressing challenges and making informed decisions.
  • Support Education and Advocacy: Encourage managers, stewards, and advocates to engage in continuous education efforts to deepen public and professional understanding of wilderness values.
  • Ensure Accessibility: Make materials easily available online, particularly through platforms like Wilderness.net. 

Awareness

Wilderness awareness involves:

  1. Understanding Legal and Policy Foundations: Familiarity with the Wilderness Act, subsequent laws, and agency management policies is critical.
  2. Hands-On Experience: Practical involvement within wilderness areas fosters an appreciation of the complexities of management.
  3. Experiential Perspective: Viewing wilderness through the eyes of advocates, visitors, and communities deepens respect for its intrinsic and spiritual values.

Awareness grows most effectively in the field—through direct interaction with wilderness environments—rather than solely through digital or classroom learning. 

Evolution of the Concept

Wilderness conservation in the U.S. has evolved over two centuries, shaped by cultural, political, and legal developments. The 1964 Wilderness Act was a pivotal achievement, establishing the National Wilderness Preservation System and defining wilderness as:

  • An area where natural processes operate freely.
  • A place with opportunities for solitude and primitive recreation.
  • A resource to be preserved for future generations.

Subsequent laws, including NEPA, RPA, FLPMA, and NFMA, integrated wilderness management into broader ecosystem and interdisciplinary frameworks. These laws emphasized public participation, ensuring wilderness management aligns with ecological and societal goals.

Challenges

Effective wilderness management requires balancing preservation and access. Challenges include:

  • Managing activities like grazing, mining, fire control, wildlife, and visitor impacts.
  • Addressing special stipulations in contemporary legislation that can dilute wilderness values.
  • Minimizing human influence while preserving opportunities for visitors to experience wilderness.

Designation alone does not ensure preservation; it demands active management guided by scientific, social, and ethical principles. 

Expertise

Wilderness management is a specialized field within natural resource management, requiring:

  • Interdisciplinary expertise in ecology, social sciences, and policy.
  • An ecosystem-based approach that integrates wilderness within broader landscapes.
  • Ongoing education and professional development to address evolving challenges and maintain wilderness as an enduring resource. 

Laws with National Implications

Since the passage of the 1964 Act, Congress has enacted over 130 laws adding acreage to the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Many of these laws include special provisions affecting specific areas or the entire system. Understanding these provisions often requires reviewing the full text of the law, the Congressional record, and the context behind them.

Wilderness managers must be familiar with the 1964 Act, the law that designated their area, and any subsequent legislation that modified it. Several laws also provide broad management guidance for multiple designated areas.

This section summarizes key laws affecting wilderness management nationally: 

The Wilderness Act states Congressional policy, establishes a National Wilderness Preservation System, defines wilderness, provides administrative and management direction, prohibits certain uses and activities, and establishes a process for adding wild lands to the NWPS. This act also lists the original areas included in the NWPS, and it provides a study and evaluation process for additional areas.

"Congress finds that - In the more populous eastern half of the United States there is an urgent need to identify, study, designate, and preserve areas for addition to the National Wilderness Preservation System..."

And "areas of wilderness in the more populous eastern half of the United States are increasingly threatened by the pressures of a growing and more mobile population, large scale industrial and economic growth, and development and uses inconsistent with the protection, maintenance and enhancement of the wilderness character."

"Therefore, the Congress finds and declares that in the National interest that these and similar areas in the eastern half of the United States be promptly designated as wilderness within the National Wilderness preservation System, in order to preserve such areas as an enduring resource of wilderness which shall be managed to promote and perpetuate the wilderness character of the land and its specific values of solitude, physical and mental challenge, scientific study, inspiration, and primitive recreation for the benefit of the American people of current and future generations."

During the debates leading up to passage of this law the Forest Service took the position that few if any areas in the east qualified as wilderness because they were not 'pristine' or 'untouched'. Congress did not accept this argument and directed the Forest Service to let go of this doctrine and follow through with inventory and recommendation of lands for Congress to consider designating as wilderness. Congress directed the National Park Service to do the same.

The Act added 16 National Forest areas to the NWPS and directed that 17 areas should be studied in eastern National Forests and within five years the Secretary of Agriculture should recommend additions to the NWPS. Condemnation authority was provided. Congress debated the issue of adding areas to the NWPS that had been severely modified. They chose to do so and declined to establish a separate "EasternWilderness" category. Wilderness areas east of the Mississippi can be referred to as"wilderness in the East."

Provides direction for the Bureau of Land Management on wilderness study and designation of wilderness areas on lands managed by the agency. This Act designates the BLM as the fourth Federal agency to manage wilderness.

Designates certain undeveloped national forest lands as wilderness and also includes the Oregon Omnibus Wilderness Act of 1978. Many wilderness advocates who fought for this law did so with the idea it corrected oversights of the Forest Service RARE I process and correctly added areas to the NWPS that the Forest Service didn't recommend. Hence the "Endangered" name for the legislation.

'By passing the Endangered Wilderness Act, Congress further established that areas previously modified or influenced by man should not be precluded from wilderness designation, nor should roadless areas near major cities since they provide primitive recreation opportunities close to population concentrations. The Congressional Record for this law endorsed the Forest Service plan to conduct a RARE II evaluation.'

In this Act Congress declined to endorse the need for buffer zones around wilderness areas. This action forced the Forest Service to abandon the 'sights and sounds' doctrine which had limited areas from being recommended for designation as wildernessbecause they were too close to roads and areas of development.

This law added over 56 million acres to the NWPS. In recognition of the special conditions that exist in Alaska, the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of 1980 (ANILCA) allowed many activities that may be permitted on national forest wilderness lands that would otherwise not conform to the Wilderness Act of 1964. Most notable are provision for maintaining existing wilderness cabins, motorized access for traditional uses and subsistence purposes, modification of fish habitat and establishment of fish hatchery programs, construction of a limited number of new recreation cabins or shelters to protect public health and safety, use of trees for log houses and firewood, and commercial salvage of beach logs. Temporary facilities, such as tent platforms and shelters, may be established for hunting and fishing.

This is a comprehensive Colorado wilderness law adding areas to the NWPS. It is especially important because the Congress referred to House Committee Report 96-617 for interpretation of the 64 Wilderness Act management direction on livestock grazing that applies to all National Forest wilderness areas.

The law is particularly important because it specifies that the provisions of the Wilderness Act relating to grazing in National Forests will be interpreted and administered according to guidelines in the House Committee Report (96-617). It also prohibits buffer zones around wilderness areas and directed a review of management policies affecting Colorado's wilderness areas. Further this Act contained RARE II sufficiency and Release language.

Other Relevant Laws

The Wilderness Act of 1964 and subsequent wilderness legislation provide essential legal direction that must be followed as intended. However, other laws governing land and resource management within designated wilderness may sometimes appear to conflict with wilderness laws. So, which laws take precedence?

In general, managers must meet the intent of all applicable laws, as no law inherently overrides another unless explicitly stated in subsequent legislation. For instance, if actions are required in wilderness to protect a species under the Endangered Species Act, those actions must be considered. However, implementation should minimize adverse impacts on wilderness character.

This section provides summaries of other laws relevant to wilderness management. 

Sec. 1 "It is the policy of the Congress that the national forests are established and shall be administered for outdoor recreation, range, timber, watershed, and wildlife and fish purposes."

Sec. 2 "The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized and directed to develop and administer the renewable surface resources of the national forests of the national forests for multiple use and sustained yield of the several products and services obtained there from." "The establishment and maintenance of areas of wilderness are consistent with the purposes and provisions of this Act."

"The purposes of this Act are: To declare a National Policy which will encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between man and his environment; to promote efforts which will prevent or eliminate damage to the environment and biosphere and stimulate the health and welfare of man; to enrich the understanding of the ecological systems and natural resources important to the Nation..."

"In order to carry out the policy set forth in this Act, it is the continuing responsibility of the Federal Government to use all practicable means, consistent with other considerations of National policy, to impose and coordinate Federal plans, functions, programs, and resources to the end that the Nation may-

  • fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for the succeeding generations;
  • attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation, risk to the health and safety, or other undesirable or unintended consequences;
  • Preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage, and maintain, wherever possible, an environment which supports diversity and variety of ...

This Act establishes the legal foundation requiring Federal Agencies to consider all actions and programs utilizing a systematic, interdisciplinary approach to evaluate the environmental effects of the proposed action. Further, agencies must identify environmental impacts which cannot be avoided, and must consider alternatives to the proposed action. Also, agencies must consider the relationship between local short- term uses of man's environment and enhancement of long term productivity and must identify and consider irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources involved in the proposed action.

These laws provide the statutory basis for protecting and managing heritage resources on Federal lands. Policies derived from this legal direction seek to balance the need for protecting heritage resources with the apparently conflicting mandate in the Wilderness Act to eliminate structures which do not have a legitimate administrative need. The intent and direction of all applicable laws must be met in wilderness.

Congress finds and declares that various species of fish, wildlife, and plants have been rendered extinct or are threatened with extinction as a consequence of economic growth and development, untempered by adequate concern or conservation.

This Act mandates conservation and the use of all methods and procedures which are necessary to bring any endangered species or threatened species to the point at which the measures provided pursuant to this Act are no longer necessary. When listed species or habitat are within wilderness managers must meet the direction and mandates of both the Wilderness Act and the Endangered Species Act.

Wilderness areas designated prior to 1970 are designated as Class I areas. Subsequent wilderness is designated as Class II. These designations provide definition of the levels of legal protection for air quality in wilderness. Air Quality monitoring in wilderness is necessary to determine if any effects from off-site pollution sources are causing impairment of wilderness resources. If impairment is determined the EPA and state Department of Environmental Quality agencies may become involved through the permit and regulatory processes to reduce the pollution at the source.

Upland and mountain wilderness areas often provide sources of clean water orginating in the natural environments. Downstream, swamp, desert, and coastal wilderness may be subject to the effects of water pollution from upstream sources.

Evolution of Clean Water Act programs over the last decade has included a shift from a program-by-program, source-by-source, pollutant-by-pollutant approach to more holistic watershed-based strategies. Under the watershed approach equal emphasis is placed on protecting healthy waters and restoring impaired ones. A full array of issues are addressed, not just those subject to CWA regulatory authority. Involvement of stakeholder groups in the development and implementation of strategies for achieving and maintaining state water quality and other environmental goals is a hallmark of this approach.

The purpose of this Act is to provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination discrimination against people with disabilities in areas of employment, transportation, communication, from the discriminatory aspects of architecture, over protective rules and policies, failure to make modifications to existing facilities and practices, and relegation to lesser services, programs, activities, benefits, jobs, or other opportunities.

The Conference Committee Report on this bill contains discussion specific to wilderness under Title V (Miscellaneous Provisions), item 76.

"(1) IN GENERAL. - Congress reaffirms that nothing in the Wilderness Act shall be construed as prohibiting the use of a wheelchair in a wilderness area by an individual whose disability requires use of a wheelchair, and consistent with the Wilderness Act,no agency shall be required to provide any form of special treatment or accommodation, or to construct any facility or modify any conditions of lands within a wilderness area to facilitate such use."

"(2) DEFINITION. - For purposes of paragraph (1), the term 'wheelchair' means a device designed solely for use by a mobility-impaired person for locomotion, that is suitable for use in an indoor pedestrian area."

"Consistent with this section and the Wilderness Act of 1964, the conferees intend that, where appropriate and consistent with the management objectives and maintenance of the wilderness character of the area, the land management agencies charged with the management responsibilities for wilderness areas designated under the authority of the Wilderness Act of 1964 should, when constructing or reconstructing a trail, bridge or facility, comply with the intent of this Act. In cases where Agencies have delegated or subcontracted their responsibilities, the intent of this section shall apply to the designee or contractor."

This Act amends the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 790 et seq.) which requires federal agencies to make facilities and programs accessible. ADA extends to mandate to all state and local governments and any facility or program receiving government funding.

The Rehabilitation Act, ADA and the '64 Wilderness Act appear to conflict dramatically if read literally without applying some common sense. The latter proposes to protect natural and undeveloped landscape values for future generations. ADA seeks to eliminate all discrimination to programs and facilities by tailoring facilities and programs to be universally accessible. The key point is that equal access will be provided and facilities will be 'universally accessible' by not discriminating against people with disabilities. Wheelchairs (as defined by the law) are allowed in wilderness and theForest Service does not install barriers to their use when constructing or reconstructing trails or bridges in wilderness. However, wilderness trail standards (management objectives) are applied and not the trail standards established for accessible non- wilderness trails. This approach allows equal access to all but does not alter the character of the wilderness.